• Slug: Sports-Bonds Hall of Fame, 1,061 words.
• Photo available.

By Amanda Valle
Cronkite News

PHOENIX – Although Cooperstown, New York, is the ultimate destination for any professional ballplayer, Barry Bonds and his fellow competitors know the path to the National Baseball Hall of Fame isn’t an open highway.

The steroid era that Bonds reigned over has created a complicated discussion full of switchback arguments and slippery logic. On Jan. 25, Bonds failed to reach the 75% mark of votes required for election into the Hall of Fame. It was the former Arizona State star’s last time on the ballot, and the snub has troubled some ASU baseball alumni.

“It’s unbelievable because I got to see (Bonds’ career) full circle,” said Los Angeles Dodgers outfielder Andre Ethier, a former ASU standout. “It means a lot but it is just a tough situation where baseball is not where it has been the past 20 years. There are people who say that the game shouldn’t have been played a certain way or something like that. But hey, it is tough to go out there and play everyday. I know it. I only played a fraction of the time of what Barry did and 12 years was tough on my body and tough on myself.”

During his career with the Pittsburgh Pirates and San Francisco Giants, Bonds hit a record 762 home runs and collected 2,935 hits and 1,996 RBI. For all his transcendence at the plate, he became a lightning rod for the debate centered around allowing steroid users into baseball’s shrine. Many consider Bonds to be one of the greatest hitters ever and feel that electing Bonds into the Hall of Fame should be a no brainer. However, after 10 years on the ballot,  Bonds  didn’t secure enough votes.

Support for the player from professional athletes around the country quickly followed.  So, too, came support from his alma mater.

ASU baseball coach Willie Bloomquist, who played professionally for 13 seasons, believes Bonds deserves a plaque on the wall beyond a doubt.

“I support Barry because he is a Sun Devil and we want to see him there,” Blomquist said. “The short story is that he dominated his era. Whatever happened in that era, happened, but he still dominated it.”

Not all athletes are supportive of Bonds gaining entry into the Hall of Fame. Former major league outfielder Doug Glanville wrote a piece for ESPN that addressed the casualties that resulted from players cheating.

“For weeks before the vote was announced, I imagined watching a parade of PED players walk up to the podium to tell us about their journey, knowing they represent a force that accelerated the demise of so many players who played it straight,” Glanville wrote.

He added, “When you can cheat your way in, the Hall of Fame feels toothless.”

The player support Bonds did receive may lessen the blow of the results. However, major leaguers don’t get a vote. Only journalists do, which lends itself to a debate of another kind.

Bob Nightengale, an ASU alumnus and USA Today MLB columnist, has been a member of the Baseball Writers’ Association of America (BBWAA) for over 10 years and voted for Bonds every year he was on the ballot.

“He was the greatest player that I have ever seen,” Nightengale said. “You can argue Babe Ruth, but that was pre-integration and everything else.”

Many BBWAA members stated that their reason for not voting for Bonds or pitcher Roger Clemens was strictly because of the steroid suspicions swirling around each. Nightengale shared why he voted the way he did and how he feels about his peers who voted differently.

“I understand where they are coming from,” he said. “They say, ‘We don’t want to have cheaters in the Hall of Fame’ or ‘We believe that anyone who has touched steroids doesn’t belong.’ However there are plenty of guys in the Hall of Fame who have used steroids or have allegations (against) them. You know we have probably elected six or seven guys with strong steroid suspicions in the past 10 years and they are in, so I don’t know why we are keeping out the two greatest players of the steroid-taking class.”

One player’s inclusion in this election raised some eyebrows about Bonds’ exclusion.  David Ortiz, who became a first-ballot Hall of Famer, was suspected of PED use after a positive test in 2003 while a member of the Boston Red Sox, though it is still unknown what substance the positive test identified. Players took to Twitter arguing that if Ortiz was voted in, Bonds and others should be elected, too, including San Francisco Giants pitcher Alex Wood, who said if Oritz “can get into the HOF on the first try with a positive test on his resume then how in god’s name does Bonds and Clemens not get in? The system is now officially broken in my eyes.”

This response sparked conversations about what the Hall of Fame really represents, and the decisions that go into choosing which players are elected.

“To me you have to be a representative of the game on the field,” Bloomquist said. “Not everyone is going to like everyone’s personality. Everyone has different views. You can’t let that judge the baseball player on the field.”

According to Nightengale, the Hall of Fame elections always bring up spirited conversations during the voting process and people have healthy debates.